Should the exhaust hang this low??

B14, B172, B19/200, D16 engine, ignition, cooling, fuel & exhaust system, gearbox, variomatic, final drive... | Tuning: engine swaps, welded diff, clutch upgrades...
NO parts requests here, please use our V3M BUY & SELL corner
Post Reply
cheshire190e
Posts: 283
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Macclesfield/Chester

Should the exhaust hang this low??

Post by cheshire190e » 28 Sep 2008 01:19 pm

Hi everyone, My car has been lowered and is on 13's but my exhaust still hangs ridiculously low in my opinion.

does the exhaust normally hang this low from the bottom of the car? its all connected up properly and its a pain because i have just moved house into the middle of speedbump city and it scrapes really badly.


Image


is there anything i can do to raise it higher? as you can see the back of the mid box is around 1" from the ground :cry:

Cheers

Matt
1987 Volvo 340 1.7

User avatar
filthyjohn
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 2693
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 09:07 pm
Location: Sunderland, Ringpiece Of England

Post by filthyjohn » 28 Sep 2008 02:42 pm

That looks almost right tbh, they're always a pain to get hanging right. You could try putting smaller rubber rings on the mounts behind the mid box there. That should pull it up a bit, along with making sure the rubbers further back in the system are the right ones and in good nick. Careful how much you lift the mid box though, don't want it bouncing off the propshaft spinning at 6k rpm!
'87 Nissan Sunny
'95 945 LPT
'90 340 3dr
'87 360 GLT
'87 765 TIC
'75 Manta A
'70 Rover P5 V8
'67 MGB GT
'62 amazon 2dr

redline
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 5432
Joined: 05 Oct 2004 10:18 am
Location: MILTON KEYNES , ENGLAND

Post by redline » 29 Sep 2008 05:15 pm

I was goping to say , just be careful lifting the system too far ,
its a thin line between the exhaust scraping speedbumps and bouncing off the underside and running gear
Image

cheshire190e
Posts: 283
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Macclesfield/Chester

Post by cheshire190e » 30 Sep 2008 03:52 pm

right, i have replaced all the rubbers and the exhaust is hanging a little higer now, i inspected it and its the back of the mid box that is catching.

I was wondering could i just get a straight piece of pipe and remove the mid box. obviously it will require some joining up, just this way there would be more clearance from the ground and more from the prop.

i just don't want it to be really loud, i would have thought with the back box still there it should be ok.

what you guys think?

matt
1987 Volvo 340 1.7

User avatar
Chris_C
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9600
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
Location: South Coast, UK

Post by Chris_C » 30 Sep 2008 07:08 pm

Backbox does most of the quieting on a 1.7, the mid is a "straight through with holes around the outside" (non baffled). It'll be a bit more throaty, but I've run mine on just the mid before, and that's veryvery noisy compared.
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast

User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP » 30 Sep 2008 07:14 pm

I reckon it'd be pretty damn loud without the middle box :S
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux

cheshire190e
Posts: 283
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Macclesfield/Chester

Post by cheshire190e » 30 Sep 2008 09:54 pm

yeh i have run mine before with just the mid box but was really noisey, i thought the back box did most the work and would just make a slight difference??
1987 Volvo 340 1.7

User avatar
stuartB
Posts: 125
Joined: 22 May 2008 04:05 pm
Location: Essex

Post by stuartB » 15 Oct 2008 11:23 am

Its a different car, but...

I dont have a midbox, and its f'in loud. My backbox is one of them straight thru no baffles jobbies.

tried it with the exhaust completely removed once, sounds like a messershmit (or however you spell it). if it wasnt for the lack of power I'd drive it like that all the time

My mate has a 1.7 that he did a side exit on - on the 340's theres lots more space for this - where my petrol tank is, you have a massive great gap. I think he got a smaller / different backbox, and tucked it up in this gap. if anything hits speedbumps, its just pipe.

looks like your clamp is in danger of being ripped off too :$
Volvo 360 GLS, 1984, 2ltr 8v SOHC, K+N filter, 2" straight thru pipe, no middle box, lowered 2", Landrover 90 shocks, BBS rims

cheshire190e
Posts: 283
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 12:40 pm
Location: Macclesfield/Chester

Post by cheshire190e » 15 Oct 2008 01:17 pm

i have chopped the midbox out and put a straight piece of pipe in its place, also i have bent the hangers upwards a little. it now hangs much lower and still chinks the bumps but its only on pipe so im just going to leave it.

cheers for the info
1987 Volvo 340 1.7

Post Reply