jtbo wrote:I managed to to few test before I have to go and it is EMV that is broken, connection A does not suck much more even there is a click, connection B test came out ok as well as under the car tests. I try to phone seller and ask if he still has one from spare car he has, just don't know what kind of prices I would except to pay from such.
Of course rebuild kit is possibility if it comes off cheaper and is enough easy to install with my non existing skills?
brilliant! looks like an easy fix then. i'd personnally go for a rebuild kit as those valves are from a brandnew and durable material, all "used" valves have slight cuts into the rubber that eventually cause it to rip.
the EMV rebuild kit is really easy to use, Robbert-Jan wrote a brilliant manual that comes with it with pics of every step, but in short terms it really is nothing more than getting the old rubber valve off and glueing the new one back on
jtbo wrote:
I was wondering here that it should be perfectly possible to make alternative control unit for vario, I think that even Megasquirt might bend for that, it would result programmable variomatic for all the uses what it may have, for example it should be possible then to get overdrive side more quickly enganged and also engine braking situation could have few presets, it might be possible even to control clutch, maybe it would be possible to make silly good mpg out from it if adjusted properly, who knows, however I'm not going to do such thing as this one is going to be under old car restricted license at some time.
as your overdrive/gear up side of the EMV doesn't work atm i'd wait what you think of it once that valve is ok, it makes a biiiiiig difference

on further notice, i wouldn't change too much about what and when the the tacho control the CVT, as varying the overdrive and how the engine brake works directly relate to the lifespan of the clutch and cvt belts.
the tacho and emv stands completely away of the clutch, the clutch is operated by centrifugal force and all it needs is a rise in the engines rpm to engage. further it has a vacuum-piston thingy that acts just like the clutch pedal on a manual car would. this system allows you to change gear with the choke on while the engine idles above it's normal clutch engaging point.
jtbo wrote:Oh yes, those big cables near heater box, they are indeed heater system wires, there is plug at front of the car, which make it look like an electric car, should get you a pic from it
i also allways wondered where the coolant heater unit is located in the engine; i guess on the right side under the exhaust manifold??
jtbo wrote:
Car needs full service of course, plugs, oil etc. I don't even know if this one has points or not, at least has not that stupid renix unit that I have great dislike, coil is next to radiator and is bit sad looking really, however seem to be working fine
yes it has points, if you want to set the ignition; dwell angle 57° and the B14.3´s dizzy 10° before TDC
jtbo wrote:Also must check if manifold is craked or not, there is some sound, it sounds like exhaust manifold seal, but might be cracked manifold too.
yeah probably the manifold, if you only hear it at the cold start and slowly goes away once the engine gets warmer i'd leave it alone or get a VERY specialisted welder to seal the tear it's a pain in the ass to weld correctly
MCHUDD wrote:Hi volvodspec.
The spare tank senders i have are from a 1989 360
and a 1991 340. could there be much difference?
Cheers Mark.

unfortunatly those can't be used.
the fuel tank of a 343/345 has a round flange on top where the sender drops in, with a separate ring to hold it in place.
with the introduction of the big dash and 340/360 these senders had a special pattern cutted into the tank for them where the sender has to be put on top in the slots and then turned clockwise to lock it into place.
in short terms, it doesn't fit and besides that the older senders had 3 electrical contacts. a ground, a fuel level signal(resistance) and a low fuel warning signal (switched)
with the 340/360 the fuel sender just had the ground and fuel level signal where the MFU that's integrated in the clockset switched the low fuel warning signal on once the resistance was at a certain point.
it's a bit of a design problem really, the old senders have a piece of resistor wire wrapped around a flat surface where the floater arm needle comes along, it eventually tears the wire wich causes the problem. the later senders had the same working principal, but with the wire more integrated into the unit. i'm personally thinking about rewrapping the sender but need to accurately measure the resistance over the wire's full length to check wich wire is used or i'll go from 1 vague fuel-sender problem to the next