360 GLT wanted

Put here your advertisements to buy cars and parts
chris-P
Posts: 5
Joined: 13 Jul 2005 02:55 pm

Post by chris-P »

ok, so i had a look on the volvo website, 87-89 models need no conversion, is there a marking on it to say this, or what would happen if your car was on the changeover date?
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP »

Not too sure on being able to tell whether the engine is unleaded - however, it's highly likely that your potential car will be late 87-89, as these are the most popular model age about now!
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
5lab
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 3454
Joined: 31 Jan 2004 01:44 pm
Location: Brighton, UK
Contact:

Post by 5lab »

all post-82 cars will run on unleaded - i've not actually seen a glt that wont take normal unleaded - but if you hear pinking you might be better off with super..
Siddy-'87 360 Glt lhd convertible
Swapsea-'89 360GLT-swapped!
Leah-'84 340GL-sold! Maisie-'85 340GL-sold!
Snowy-'88 360GLE-killed by a truck! Dougle-'89 360GLT-dead&stolen!
Nessy-'86 340GL-foggy's! Grace-'86 360GLT-gone!
User avatar
foggyjames
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9361
Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Post by foggyjames »

My advice...get a carb engined model. We proved at Santa Pod (the 1/4 mile drag strip) that the 'economy' carb engine does almost as good a job (GLE and GLT finished within a car length, although my GLE had been stripped of some weight), and the difference in economy is significant, especially on long journeys. I've returned 52mpg before, which for a 2.0 almost-sierra-sized car is pretty good going.

If performance is important, even the GLT really isn't that swift (0-60 quoted as 10.5s, 1/4mile in the low 18s), so prepare yourself for an engine swap. Options up to 200bhp are available in a package externally identical to a stock B200E (right Mr Insurance man....;)), and information is widely available.

Compared to the 440 2.0, the 360 GLT will be uneconomical, slow, noisy, and will handle (at least superficially) worse. Then again the same is true when comparing it to a Corolla GTi, and I'm in no rush to get one of those either! It's a car full of character, surprisingly practical (the boot of my 360 is easily bigger than that or our V40....an estate!), and which with a little tweaking could have joined ranks of the great hot hatches.

#####

Steve's covered all the bases on what to look for I think, but a quick word on engines...

Although nowhere near the troublesome nature of the 340's Renault engines (he says, exaggerating grossly!!), both the B200K (carb) and B200E (injection) in the 300s seem to have subtle problems occasionally. Even when exhibiting these problems, they'll run more or less indefinitely without reliability issues (to the point where you'd barely notice), but they blunt the performance and economy marginally.

Latterly, something was up with my carb (we think - fitting twin sidedrafts seemed to fix it anyway... :mrgreen: ), blunting performance in higher gears. Occasionally it'd sit up and GO on the motorway, but it was rare. When my folks got my 360 13 years ago, it was surprisingly devastating at pulling in 3rd up to ~70. At age 17, most of that was gone. Multiple mechanics blamed engine wear, but a worn engine doesn't use almost zero oil, nor return 138bhp on a dyno with only a cam and twin carb swap! Brand new carbs are available for ~£150, and a rebuild of your original by a professional ought to cheaper.

Injection models almost all seem to suffer with a poor idle, and lumpy running when cold, as well as poorer than expected economy. They still pull like a train (relatively), but something is obviously not quite right. We're working on figuring out exactly what that is...

#####

I'm painting a gloomy picture here, but they're actually one of the most reliable engines in existance, although they like good maintainance. We've yet to hear of a 360 breaking down, let alone an engine dying before the shell does! My preferance would be for the underated (and therefore often cheaper) carb models (GL and GLE), but both are fine chariots with their strengths and weaknesses.

The best bit is you can buy a clean-as-they-come example with change from £300, and with a little TLC go and rescue your friends newer cars when they break down, as well as seriously annoying a few hot hatches with the RWD goodness! Enjoy the hunt...

cheers

James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP »

Nice summery - and I agree, get a carbed model! I scraped 30mpg over 350 miles worth of motorway journey, which isn't too great - the carb model can do far more.

They are a bit dated now, but as foggy said they do certainly have character and are fun to drive. After a brief switch to driving a Peugeot 405, which had far better ride, handling, refinment and economy - getting back into the 360 is far more satisfying. :)
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7943
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Post by SteveP »

Chris, I don't know where you're located but this sounds good:

VOLVO 360 GLE 1989, low mileage, lady owner, MoT up to end April 2006, Tax to end May 2006, fsh £250 ono - , (aadt-30-979)* Tel: (07092) 934789
Price: £250.00

Town: Harleston

Postcode: IP20
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
Post Reply