Page 3 of 4
Posted: 28 Oct 2007 07:48 pm
by Carl
Mine was up for £750 without any of the extra work done. But luckily I knew the guy and when he said I could have it for £400 I wasn't gonna say no!!
Posted: 28 Oct 2007 08:18 pm
by foggyjames
The early ones were indeed just a 'T5', as far as I know. Later on you could get a T5 with 'S' spec (manual rear windows, etc) through to CD trim with a power driver's seat, etc.
cheers
James
Posted: 28 Oct 2007 11:26 pm
by Carl
Ah, well it's above S spec as it's got leccy rear windows

Posted: 29 Oct 2007 10:23 am
by Ricatron
26.9mpg is good!
i like those figures!
and £500!!!!!!! i would take that!!!
well now i have my eyes open for one

wish they were rear drive though
if they were rear drive i would - as the rest of the world - snap them up!
be a monster car with massive tuning potential
Posted: 30 Oct 2007 07:57 am
by redline
[quote="Ricatron"]if they were rear drive i would - as the rest of the world - snap them up!/quote]
get a 960 then 2.5 or 3.0 of 24 valve rwd loveliness
the last proper volvo
and in my opinion better looks ( sorry Carl )

Posted: 30 Oct 2007 09:57 am
by Ricatron
yeah the 960 is the one to have
the tuning swedes love them fot good reason.
right now i need to get my 335i on the road but who know for the future as i do love a sleeper

Posted: 30 Oct 2007 06:42 pm
by Carl
Yeah they are nice I have to admit. But I don't reckon they'd have quite the same 'punch' behind them - feel free to correct me though as I've never tried one!! Although if it had been a 960 for £400 I'd have definitely taken that anyway

Posted: 30 Oct 2007 07:24 pm
by SteveP
Yeah, even a 3.0 manual isn't going to be that brisk.... certainly not T5 pace! T6 a 960 however....

Posted: 30 Oct 2007 07:40 pm
by foggyjames
A 3.0 manual S90 (as 960 saloons were badged after...97?) is just a shade slower than my S70 2.5 20v....so a fair bit slower than a T5.
cheers
James
Posted: 31 Oct 2007 01:22 am
by redline
its not just about the speed though is it
Posted: 31 Oct 2007 02:16 am
by foggyjames
We were talking about speed!
The 960/x90 series cars are more refined in terms of engine and driveline noise & vibration....other than that, the S/V70s have them licked on almost every count.
cheers
James
Posted: 31 Oct 2007 08:13 am
by Carl
redline wrote:its not just about the speed though is it
Yes it is

Posted: 31 Oct 2007 11:26 am
by Ricatron
yeah it is about speed but how many of the cars there are rear wheel drive?
960 only and is it not true there is a turbo 960

thats the one with MASSIVE tuning potential and thats what im thinking about

Posted: 31 Oct 2007 11:40 am
by SteveP
Ricatron wrote:960 only and is it not true there is a turbo 960

thats the one with MASSIVE tuning potential and thats what im thinking about

Yeah well the 960 turbo is just a 2.3 redblock turbo again... same tuning potential as any 700/900 tbh
Posted: 31 Oct 2007 02:00 pm
by classicswede
The 960 (auto) is a quick car in fainess. Strap on a turbo or blower and you can have a mental car.
If I had teh coice between the 960 and T5 I would go for the 960 - if the T5 had the engien fitted correctly that desision could be different