Ali's drift 360 project
Ali, I stuck the file through powerdyn last night, lets just say I reckon you are being conservative on the torque... I have some pics with yours and Fake together for a comparison, but I won't post anything till you say so!
EDIT: Hmm, looking at it again, mine does look unrealistically high.. hmm, I'll have a check again...
EDIT: Hmm, looking at it again, mine does look unrealistically high.. hmm, I'll have a check again...
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
Nah it'll grip through 2nd fine in the dry in a straight line, pretty certain it wouldn't in the wet though, haven't even tried using 1st on boost haha, it just pulls and pulls in every gear lol,
Forgot we were using Andys powerdyn setup so my cars a lot lighter, less power than I thought but still........

Forgot we were using Andys powerdyn setup so my cars a lot lighter, less power than I thought but still........

Down to one car shocker! 1994 200sx S14 119k
Hello mate have you taken into account the welded diff.......sure to make some sort of difference
I reckon about 170bhp wouldn't be an unfair guess. We could probably get more by dialling in more ignition advance up at the high revs to get a better 'headline' figure, but on the 'butt dyno' its fast enough 
Hmmm, what drivetrain loss do you have in for that setup Ali?
I reckon I have too much loss, as my numbers seem too high, will have to go to a trusted dyno one day to calibrate it. Anyway, comparision to a stock 1.7, both using the same setup.
Power
Torque
I reckon I have too much loss, as my numbers seem too high, will have to go to a trusted dyno one day to calibrate it. Anyway, comparision to a stock 1.7, both using the same setup.
Power
Torque
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
- foggyjames
- *** V3M DONOR ***
- Posts: 9361
- Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
That sounds believeable. You're just about on stock torque (perhaps a whisker more). Stock power for a B200FT was 155, but you have a big exhaust, hotter cam, and MS, which will be less conservative with the tuning than LH.
Nice work
Can't wait to go for a ride in it!
cheers
James
Nice work
cheers
James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
He also has a welded diff, which is gonna increase drivetrain losses considerably, so I reckon 170 bhp isn't a bad guess. As I said above ^^, there's scope to get a better 'headline' figure, but this map was quite conservative, particularly at the top revs, where the peak bhp will be.
We could also get more from the bottom end of the torque curve too, but we were pretty happy with what we got.
We could also get more from the bottom end of the torque curve too, but we were pretty happy with what we got.
No risk of that happening! Been driving it all day haha, i've got some videos but im not at home yet so i'll edit them and upload later, just a shame the camera sound is TOTALLY distorted with the noise of it haha, one of the vids shows the pace of it quite nicely though
Down to one car shocker! 1994 200sx S14 119k
It doesn't need a dump valve, it sounds fine without i'm sure Andy will agree haha, might get some flames off the limiter but haven't got that far yet, no real need lol, video here when youtube decides to work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jszAIVqu9Gs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jszAIVqu9Gs
Down to one car shocker! 1994 200sx S14 119k



on smaller turbo's the sound just isn't seperated so much so sounds more like a dump valve than the clear tch tch tch sort of thing