which car had most torque
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 08:15 am
answer away chaps 
talking about non-cat mk3 cars.
talking about non-cat mk3 cars.B200K: 160 Nm at 3000 rpm
B200E: 159 Nm at 4200 rpm
http://volvo300mania.com/uk/forum/
which car had most torque
Page 1 of 1
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 11:10 am
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 11:25 am
damn, i know that, i was hoping everyone else got it wrong cos it surprised me 
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 11:43 am
I'm trying to collect information about the differences between a 360 GLT and a 360 GL injection. Everything is welcome! 5lab, you said something one day about the fuel consumption (lower for the GLi), can you find the numbers again?
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 12:10 pm
i'll have a look tonight
incidentally, someone blabbered that the final drives are different, this is NOT the case - all i can suggest is maybe the fatter tyres make fuel economy worse?
incidentally, someone blabbered that the final drives are different, this is NOT the case - all i can suggest is maybe the fatter tyres make fuel economy worse?
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 02:22 pm
I would have answered GL also. Although I didn't remembered nm-figures but the B200K has a Y- or L-cam which are much more low torque cams than A-cam with B200E which is much more rpm-cam. B200K also has higher compression ratio than B200E.
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 06:12 pm
whats that in lbft ? for us oldies 
and is that at wheels or flywheel?
and is that at wheels or flywheel?Posted: 05 Oct 2004 07:30 pm
Ooh... The one with an implanted RB26DETT! Just because it wouldn't fit 
At least that's my bet. I want a Volvo 345 GT-R V-Spec 
At least that's my bet. I want a Volvo 345 GT-R V-Spec Posted: 05 Oct 2004 08:17 pm
Yeah I've heard sooo many things about the "possible" differences between the 360 GLT and GL injection... I don't believe there are any differences mechanically (for example between the final drives), the power is the same between my GLi and my ex GLT, same reactions on the road.5lab wrote:i'll have a look tonight
incidentally, someone blabbered that the final drives are different, this is NOT the case - all i can suggest is maybe the fatter tyres make fuel economy worse?
Thanks if you can find some info about that.
I'm convinced there's only a difference for the equipment but not mechanically.
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 08:18 pm
suspension is different isnt it?
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 08:27 pm
I'm REALLY not sure about that...
Probably yes for one "detail", gas shock absorbers on the GLT for the rear wheels and "normal" oil shock aborbers for the 360 GLi, that's a fact.
Except that, it's the same from my point of view.
I've heard that the front wheel-axle unit SHOULD be different but I don't believe that and I need concrete elements to prove that.
Probably yes for one "detail", gas shock absorbers on the GLT for the rear wheels and "normal" oil shock aborbers for the 360 GLi, that's a fact.
Except that, it's the same from my point of view.
I've heard that the front wheel-axle unit SHOULD be different but I don't believe that and I need concrete elements to prove that.
Posted: 05 Oct 2004 08:34 pm
Nah.. You don't need a Nissan engine for those HP's.Azurael wrote:Ooh... The one with an implanted RB26DETT! Just because it wouldn't fit
Volvo Redblock with 16V top and turbo big enough will give same power figures. 
http://www.300power.com/medlemmar/stange/bild36.jpg
http://www.300power.com/medlemmar/stange/bild63.jpg
http://www.300power.com/medlemmar/stange/bild68.jpg
(That car is sick btw...
I have a vid of that thing beating an Eclipse, a Vette etc... on a strip. Crazy Swedes... They are taking over 1000hp from redblocks there... Not street machines usually though but still impressive. Though there are couple over 600hp 240's with redblocks street legal there.)