Page 1 of 2

The engine now.... Wich to go for?

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 12:07 pm
by 340cbr
After the suspension I'm gonna made something to raise the power a little bit in my 340 1.7 :lol:

Now it has the B172K with a 440GL Solex carburator. It's not bad but I wan't more :lol:

After talk with my associate in this project car, we have some options like:

1. Not swaping the engine:

option 1.1 - Change the head to a 440 GLT one, raising the compression ratio to 10.5:1

option 1.2 - Turbocharge this motor (low boost pressure)

2. Swaping the engine...

option 2.1 - to a complete B18FT from a 400 Turbo

option 2.2 - to a Clio/19 16v F16 Renault motor

Every of it have advantages and disadvantages.


What's your opinion? Wich is the best to go for? Advantages?

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 12:20 pm
by 340 Nate
i'd go for the renault F16 engine as ive been thinking of getting one to strip, clean and add forged pistons etc, prolly add a turbo kit to it if all things works out right in the engine bay?

cheers

Nate

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 02:07 pm
by Wiktor
Hi 340cbr.
I've got B172K too, and I have a few questions :)
Did you change only carburator? Or meaby carburator with inlet manifold.
And what about exhaust manifold?

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 03:23 pm
by 340cbr
Only the carb.

The exhaust manifold is different in the 440, but I don't think is that easy to put it in the 340 cause of the motor position...

But the carb gives you some difference :lol:

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 05:46 pm
by 5lab
put the 16v engine in. most powerful, easy to tune..

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 05:59 pm
by 340 Nate
just wondering (again :P ) if the engine mounts on the F16 are same as the B172K?, any chopping with manifolds aswell trying to fit it in or would it be a custom exhaust?

cheers

Nate

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 07:18 pm
by volvorsport
i researched this in the late 90s .

basically the 16v will fit the bellhousing , but you cant be sure it has all the holes drilled for the rear drive configuration .

unsure if the head will fit straight over onto a 1.7 block , since it fits the 1.8 which is an overbored 1.7

if it did you would fly cut the turbo pistons for the valves , and have a low compression for turbocharging .

there may be issues with manifolding not being able to fit since it goes to a crossflow design .


if you see the pics of the forged rods ive shown , these would be ideal for the conversion , or a high power turbo lump .

i met a guy (well i worked with him for two weeks) who used to work at meccachrome and built a few 16v renaults , with diesel rods and 2 litre pistons , since they are huge apparently . the next mod would be some cams , and a remap would unleash 30 hp . over a std engine , not to mention the 2 litre version if you were going to build it .

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 08:04 pm
by jtbo
SJS has installed 16-valve 2,5l penta engine:
http://koti.mbnet.fi/fredrikr/Volvo%20340DL/images/

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 08:31 pm
by classicswede
The big problem with the 16v renault engine is the the air intake goes direct into the heater housing. I have measured it up. Not impossible to overcome.

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 09:45 pm
by Wiktor
340cbr wrote:Only the carb.

The exhaust manifold is different in the 440, but I don't think is that easy to put it in the 340 cause of the motor position...

But the carb gives you some difference :lol:
So the inlet manifold i s from 340?

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 10:42 pm
by 340cbr
Since the inlet manifold and the exhaust manifold are joined, yes we kept the 340 manifolds. The exhaust manifold from the 440 Gl is better though.

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 10:43 pm
by 340cbr
classicswede wrote:The big problem with the 16v renault engine is the the air intake goes direct into the heater housing. I have measured it up. Not impossible to overcome.
Could you explain with images if possible? :wink:

Posted: 16 Dec 2005 10:50 pm
by 340cbr
The F7P (1.8 ) and F7R (2.0) engines from Renault are a improvement from the 1.7 litre engine. In the Renault's the F7P (1.8L) uses the same gearbox (with slight differences in the gear ratio) from some F2N (1.7) engines. Therefore i think the engine will fit in the 340 and the housing for the rear drive configuration maybe will too.

I forgot to tell that both switches for the 400 Turbo engine or Renault F7P/F7R engine will also mean switch to fuel injection system :D

Posted: 17 Dec 2005 02:38 am
by foggyjames
Best bang for the buck has to be the 1.7 turbo.

cheers

James

Posted: 17 Dec 2005 03:39 am
by 340cbr
foggyjames wrote:Best bang for the buck has to be the 1.7 turbo.

cheers

James
Maybe :wink:
The Renault engine will give 140...150 bhp non-supercharged, therefore the revs will go up in a uniform way. With the Volvo turbo engine, it means that at some point you will have a surge of torque that might be difficult to handle while in powerslide. I don't know which one to choose :lol: