thoughts on 2.3 performance....

B14, B172, B19/200, D16 engine, ignition, cooling, fuel & exhaust system, gearbox, variomatic, final drive... | Tuning: engine swaps, welded diff, clutch upgrades...
NO parts requests here, please use our V3M BUY & SELL corner
User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Edcase 300 »

Hi people. Basically just wondering if anyone is running a fuel injected B230 in thier Volvo?

My experience with the B200E in my 360 (bear in mind its probably never ran 100% right) is that it lacks the initial poke of the 340 1.7 which my parents used to have but once up to speed pulls quite well (good on the motorway).

How would a B230E for instance (130 ish bhp & 185 nm) behave in the 360? (Without mods to the engine-stock B230 EFi engine).

I know the B200E develops peak torque quite high up the rpm band but i dont like reving her past 4500 in spirited drives (get noisey etc).
The B230E ( i think) develops peak torque lower down the rev range (it seems to have wider powerband) :? Would a stock B230E be nicer to drive (more responsive-im not looking for out and out perfrmance but somethign more responsive tbh than my B200E-I also hear the B230 isnt hugely thirstier then the B200E?)

I dont know much about this subject so i just want to know everyones thoughts :P Dont be shy :lol:
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7944
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by SteveP »

Ideally you want a B230F... running LH2.4 management which is Lambda controlled compared to the mechanical fuel injection of the B230E. I think you'd find a b230 running on decent fuel injection to be a bit of a revelation in a 360! You'd have to change flywheel though as the timing markings are different for Bosch LH2.4 compared to the 360's original LE-Jet
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Edcase 300 »

i really like the sound of that :D is it worth risking getting the lump from the scrappie/breakers? I tried getting in touch with Braydon Motors who re volvo breakers but when i mentioned that i was looking for an engine they didnt reply back :oops: :roll: :lol:
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7944
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by SteveP »

If you can find one with sensible mileage (preferably under 150k, saying that they're not exactly stressed in N/A form!) a scrappy is the place to go! Don't pay more than £150-200 though, some places have silly ideas as to how much engines are worth. If possible get the lot from a 240, as the engine management wiring is much easier to detach from the main electrical wiring loom. Alternatively, if your original engine is ok a conversion to LH 2.4 using B200F ecu's, flywheel, wiring and sensors would be a nice improvement in my opinion. Both in terms of economy and performance/response. I suppose though if you're going to the efforts of swapping a flywheel the engine swap isn't too bad additionally.
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Edcase 300 »

aahhh sweet :D exactly what i like to hear :lol: Im loded with info-my next tep is to start looking about!
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)
User avatar
SteveP
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 7944
Joined: 21 Sep 2004 12:45 pm
Location: Coventry, UK

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by SteveP »

Oh also you'll have to modify the bellhousing for the LH 2.4 timing sensor.

This performance calculator is usually quite a good estimate....

http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.asp

130bhp and 1100kg gives

Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 120.08
0 - 60 (Secs) : 8.63
0 - 100 (Secs) : 26.76
60 - 100 (Secs) : 18.14
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 17.10
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 79.92

Personally I'd consider a hotter cam, say a K or H Volvo cam or import one from Sweden... and Dai's 4-2-1 manifold with a 2.5" system from there back. I can't see why 140-150bhp isn't achievable like that.
1989 - Volvo 360 GLT
1985 - Volvo 360 GLS
2008 - Volvo S60 SE Lux
User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Edcase 300 »

Those are some exciting looking figures! The 360 should have had a 2.3 (or these figures-even though its no slouch when it wants to be)... :D

You know i felt pretty inspired by the post so i went about getting to my fuel pump... so i got under the car and went to remove the bolts to get the heat shield out to get the fuel pump+filter out (to do an inspection)...but found that two last bolts were just not budging :roll: im now considering angle grinder brutishness to get them off... :lol:

Not surpirsed some of the bolts were siezed though (22 yrs old now)...i also (whilst in the undercar adventure realised that its not 'too' bad rust wise but my sills and wings are buggered..oh well..i'll be stripping the car out eventually to get some bodywork done...im getting carried away and sounding like a Smith's song hahaa)

Im liking the idea of a Dai special 4-2-1 manifold + 2.5" system and hot cam goodness ... with those mods id probs see about getting some uprated suspension goodness and tyreage... hehe :lol:
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)
vØlvØfreak
Posts: 317
Joined: 08 Nov 2008 05:39 pm
Location: Born (Netherlands)

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by vØlvØfreak »

Edcase 300 wrote:Im liking the idea of a Dai special 4-2-1 manifold + 2.5" system and hot cam goodness ... with those mods id probs see about getting some uprated suspension goodness and tyreage... hehe :lol:
And you haven't seen a pic of it yet? It is pure porn mate 8)

Image

I was also thinking of getting one.... maybe a groupbuy is an option? They are quite expensive :wink:
User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Edcase 300 »

:shock: ... must start saving up.... 8) Some lovely work
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)
User avatar
jtbo
Posts: 5805
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 03:50 am
Location: Finland, middle of nowhere
Contact:

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by jtbo »

SteveP wrote:Oh also you'll have to modify the bellhousing for the LH 2.4 timing sensor.

This performance calculator is usually quite a good estimate....

http://www.letstorquebhp.com/calculator.asp

130bhp and 1100kg gives

Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) : 120.08
0 - 60 (Secs) : 8.63
0 - 100 (Secs) : 26.76
60 - 100 (Secs) : 18.14
Quarter Mile (Secs) : 17.10
Terminal Speed (MPH) : 79.92

Personally I'd consider a hotter cam, say a K or H Volvo cam or import one from Sweden... and Dai's 4-2-1 manifold with a 2.5" system from there back. I can't see why 140-150bhp isn't achievable like that.
If running FI 150 is quite much most one can get before swapping in bigger injectors, but then again, put same mods to B230 and it is 20-30hp more than with B200?

My B200 with K-cam and MS got about 9 seconds for 2nd gear idle to limiter and as you probably know first 2-3k are bit slow compared to above 3k.

0-60 time is slowed down with change to 3rd gear in our cars, with 360GL 3rd gear is also quite tall so I don't know if calculator is very accurate in there, but I know that there is plenty of performance to keep up with traffic and compared to stock, overtaking voids your license very easily as where before you get into 120kph with mods you end up to 150kph :oops:
Volvo 360GL -88 -under restoration-
Volvo 343DL vario -81 -running- Image
Volvo 240 Diesel -83 -undecided-
Citroen ZX Dturbo -97 -daily- ImageImage
User avatar
Chris_C
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9600
Joined: 18 Jun 2004 11:53 pm
Location: South Coast, UK

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Chris_C »

jtbo wrote:0-60 time is slowed down with change to 3rd gear in our cars, with 360GL 3rd gear is also quite tall so I don't know if calculator is very accurate in there, but I know that there is plenty of performance to keep up with traffic and compared to stock, overtaking voids your license very easily as where before you get into 120kph with mods you end up to 150kph :oops:
Up the rev limit :D Since I've had my valver in I've not noticed the 3rd gear hole, huge amount more low end torque and top end pull all the way to 7grand :shock:

It's almost as though Volvo were expecting Adam to come along :lol: :lol:
'89(G) 340 GLE B172k
'03 S60 D5 SE, '91 (J) MX5, 1954 Cyclemaster
Ex:
'89(F) 340 GL F7R (ex B172k) - Fake -> SBKV 300 Runner Up 08, 12; '91(H) 340 GL B14.4E - Kar; '88(F) 360 GLT B200E - Jet -> BKV 300 Runner Up 09; '89(G) 360 GLT B200E - Beast
User avatar
jtbo
Posts: 5805
Joined: 23 Jul 2004 03:50 am
Location: Finland, middle of nowhere
Contact:

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by jtbo »

Chris_C wrote:Up the rev limit :D Since I've had my valver in I've not noticed the 3rd gear hole, huge amount more low end torque and top end pull all the way to 7grand :shock:

It's almost as though Volvo were expecting Adam to come along :lol: :lol:
Upping rev limit would require too much of work, B200 with thin rods is not ideal for a screamer really, chicken bones tend to snap :mrgreen:

I'm perfectly happy with stock 101hp now, probably will not even rev past 4k anyway, feeling tad old age hitting and so on :lol:
Volvo 360GL -88 -under restoration-
Volvo 343DL vario -81 -running- Image
Volvo 240 Diesel -83 -undecided-
Citroen ZX Dturbo -97 -daily- ImageImage
User avatar
foggyjames
*** V3M DONOR ***
Posts: 9361
Joined: 29 Jan 2004 04:20 am
Location: Nottingham, UK

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by foggyjames »

I just thought I'd stop by to add that this thread is entirely full of good advice! Take heed of what's been said here and you'll be laughing. :)

cheers

James
VOC 300-series Register Keeper
'89 740 Turbo Intercooler
'88 360 Turbo Intercooler
'85 360 GLT
'81 343 GLS R-Sport
'79 343 DL
'70 164
...and some modern FWD nonsense to get me to work...
User avatar
Edcase 300
Posts: 201
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 10:29 am
Location: Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK.

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by Edcase 300 »

This thread is Gold... (ive even made notes onto powerpoint format as im wierd and love compiling research into powerpoint format)... :lol:
F reg Volvo 360 GLT 118k miles (My first car) RIP
G reg Volvo 340 1.7 122k miles (Started my Interest in Volvo 300s) RIP
Currently Driving a Citroen AX 1.0 'Eco-Box Stopgap' :-i
One Day... Volvo 360 Turbo ;-)
whiskeyonesix
Posts: 373
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 12:43 pm
Location: Perth Australia
Contact:

Re: thoughts on 2.3 performance....

Post by whiskeyonesix »

Absolutely! Can we get one of the Admin chaps to Sticky this?
MKIII 360GLT Aus-spec B200EA 239K
Mods: custom paint fade
New Cylinder head.
Auxilary cooling fan.
195/60/14 Pyonghung Ditchfinder tyres
Vario Vents FTW

G8 4 DRFTN etc....
Post Reply